steak > burger
If anything, it reflects poorly on him. Can someone please tell me why a woman has to be faithful to a man who isn't doing his job of satisfying her sexual needs? If his lovemaking skills were up to par, then she would not have had to go elsewhere to find satisfaction.
We've all heard the expression "why go out for burgers when you have steak at home". Apparently in this case, there was no steak at home.
All relationships are based on mutual happiness, and a marriage vow should be a formalization of something that is implicit, not a prison sentence. A woman is (or should be) faithful because she is satisfied and happy - not because of an oath.
If she cheated on him, then its his fault for being a poor lay. If he chooses to advertise that on his website, then not only is he bad in bed, but apparently not very bright either.